Happy Wednesday! This week’s topic is one the markets are watching closely…

IN ACTION

“President Trump fired two members of the Federal Trade Commission, an independent agency, and this could cause the kind of legal fight about the Administration’s power to fire independent people. If those firings stand, is that a threat to the Fed’s independence? Could he do the same thing to the Fed Board?” - Christopher Rugaber’s Question to Chair Powell, Chair Powell’s Press Conference (March 19, 2025)

THE BASICS

The Federal Reserve maintains minimal political influence to protect monetary policy from political pressures. If politicians could sway Fed decisions, what would prevent the central bank from pursuing political interests over sound economic policy? The Federal Reserve’s independence is one of its most vital qualities, enabling it to focus on the country’s long-term economic health rather than short-term political gains.

WHY IT MATTERS

The importance of the Federal Reserve’s independence cannot be overstated. The Fed is one of the most consequential economic institutions in the world, capable of profoundly shaping the American economy and global markets. If government officials had influence over the central bank, it could become vulnerable to short-term political pressures - potentially prioritizing political goals over economic stability. By remaining independent from political influence, the Federal Reserve can make objective decisions, which in turn builds credibility with markets and the public.

The history of the Federal Reserve’s independence is complicated. At a high level, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 designed the Fed with a blend of public and private elements. Its journey towards greater autonomy accelerated with the Banking Act of 1935, which shifted more power to the Federal Reserve Board (the governing body of the Fed). Across the economic crises that followed, the government became increasingly tolerant of the central bank operating free from political influence. Congress and the President have retained the power to appoint the Fed’s leadership, but politicians have generally accepted that an independent Federal Reserve is best positioned to achieve its long-term goals.

2025 AND BEYOND

Last week, President Trump attacked Chair Powell in a Truth Social post, calling him a “major loser” whose “termination cannot come fast enough.” He doubled down a few days later, saying Powell would step-down from his role if asked. Trump’s aggressive rhetoric rattled the markets, contributing to a sell-off in U.S. equities as investors questioned whether the Federal Reserve’s independence was under threat. Since then, Trump has struck a different tone, telling a group of reporters he has “no intention” of firing Chair Powell. While markets have responded positively to this development, questions about the Fed’s ability to operate independently of political influence are likely to remain in focus in the months and years ahead.

For questions or to request a future topic: [email protected]